Click Video Above To Watch

There Are Multiple Problems With Vaccine Passports

George Gammon and civil rights attorney Robert Barnes discuss the ramifications of a Covid vaccine passport and its legality on a recent Rebel Capitalist Show interview.

Despite the grotesque personal freedom and medical privacy intrusions at stake, it appears big governments around the world are working hard to prime the public for vaccine passports.

A deleted tweet from the World Economic Forum
The World Economic Forum has since deleted this tweet.

How will they ever be able to tell if someone is vaccinated or not?

If a vaccinated person walks into a California Safeway with their mask off, how long before they are confronted by an employee (or social justice warrior for that matter) and asked to either provide proof of their vaccination record or be asked to leave?

The answer is probably going to be minutes, and there will be controversy. Obviously, the central planner solution is a vaccine passport. It's a passive way to avoid any direct aggression from a dissenter.

These kinds of people like to pick fights, just not directly. And like most bad ideas, history is not on their side, again.

The Nuremberg Code

In 1947, everybody agreed that the age of governmental experimentation on human beings was over.

That, because the Nazis had taken what the USA had been doing with Eugenics and forced sterilization, and other involuntary medical experimentation, like the Tuskegee Syphilis Study, and the Mustard gas exposure testing during World War 2, to a whole new level.

We now see how grotesque scientists in lab coats can become when given that kind of power.

What the Nazis did was a moral horror. But let's not forget that the Japanese also dabbled in human experimentation during World War 2. Japan was responsible for some of the most notorious war crimes carried out during the war. See Unit 731.

Once the war was over, and these shocking war crimes were exposed, the international community embraced a new law, that stated you cannot force anyone to take any medical drug, or medical treatment, without their informed consent. Until now.

The vaccine passports, mandatory vaccines, and conditioning employment, education, and travel requirements

Employment, education, and even travel have constitutional rights to property or liberty. According to Barnes, these liberties are now in jeopardy.

In Barnes's view, the big governments of the world are taking a position that directly assaults the Nuremberg code.

A return to the Carrie Buck Era

According to Barne's, we're going back to the 1920s. Or at least they are trying to push us back into the Carrie Buck era.

The Carrie Buck case was one of the most morally horrendous decisions in our constitution's history. The Supreme Court of The United States essentially greenlit forced sterilization.

Korematsu v. U.S.

The Carrie Buck decision was a slippery slope that led to forced detention camps in the USA during World War 2. Imagine being forced into a detention camp simply based on ancestry? Imagine being deprived of all your rights, and all your property as a result. See Korematsu v. U.S. 

According to Barnes, this is exactly what the Global Elites are actively attempting to restore, right now. In the United States, they are using the Jacobson Decision to push their agenda.

The Jacobson Decision

According to Wikipedia, The Jacobson Decision was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court upheld the authority of states to enforce compulsory vaccination laws. The Court's decision articulated the view that individual liberty is not absolute and is subject to the police power of the state.

We Do Not Need a system where the white lab coats get to tell everyone what to do

The Carrie Buck Case, Korematsu, and the Jacobson Decision are three morally horrendous and unconstitutional examples of government overreach. The Supreme court even agrees.

And yet, the powers that be are trying to restore it again and go back to a day and age, where a system of white lab coats gets to tell everyone what to do.

The Core Problem

According to Barnes, this roll-back of systematic government over-reach gives unelected white coats, like government scientists, the authority to dictate what we can and can't do. And Robert Barnes believes this is a direct violation of the Nuremberg Code.

The Nuremberg Code and constitutional liberties prevent any level of government from requiring vaccines as a condition of employment, education, travel, or rights.

The Anti-discrimination act against the Disabled

This is specific to the United States. The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities and guarantees equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities in employment, transportation, public accommodations, state and local government services, and telecommunications.

The Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) actually covers the core problem with vaccine passports.

For example, if an employer thinks you are sick or treats you as someone who has a medical condition and doesn't allow you employment based on a perceived disability – much like NOT TAKING the vaccine could be perceived as a disability – then the employer must make accommodations.

The vaccine must be essential for your job, for the employer to discriminate against you.

Employers And Educational Institutions Are Violating ADA

The current efforts of employers, educational institutions, and public accommodations, are in direct violation of the laws that protect against discrimination, based on perceived health statistics.

You need clear and convincing evidence that NOT taking the vaccine poses a substantial risk of SEVERE harm to others.

So far there has been only one case that has tested the evidentiary basis of this theory.

The case came before a judge in the western district of Pennslyvania, Judge Dickman, about whether or not the lockdown orders met ADA requirements. And according to Judge Dickman, the lockdown orders never came close to meeting the requirements.

There Is No Evidence That Supports Unvaccinated People Causing Severe Bodily Harm To Others

What's the clear and convincing evidence of substantial risk that a person who doesn't take the vaccine will transmit it to others and is likely to cause them severe bodily harm?

If there was a 1% risk that an unvaccinated person with COVID could cause somebody else severe bodily injury by not taking the vaccine, then that would NOT be high enough to meet the substantial risk requirement under the current law.

This has been tested out repeatedly in disability hearings.

Claimants tend to claim that Y condition will cause X problem. And the judge will say that the claimant needs to show substantial risk and evidence. And that evidence must be clear and convincing.

What's more convincing is a 10%, 20%, 30%, or more risk factor. In other words, there needs to be at least a 10% risk factor that an unvaccinated person is going to transmit the virus in such a way that it is going to kill somebody else.

Reasonable Accommodations Poke Hole In Vaccine Passport Case

The first obstacle a covid passport proponent must accept is that there are reasonable accommodations for a person suffering from Covid. You lock yourself down until you no longer have it.

The only risk the covid vaccine reports to solve is the risk of asymptomatic or presymptomatic transmission.

So the second problem facing the covid passport enthusiast is the lack of asymptomatic transmission data.

It's most likely because these people do not have enough viral load to transmit the virus in the first place.

In other words, you must have covid, not be aware, and transmit it to someone who will be affected in such a way, that it will cause severe bodily harm.

Despite the hype, historical data shows influenza type virus rarely transmits from asymptomatic or presymptomatic carriers to others.

In brief summary of this section, there are two problems the pro-covid passport person must overcome.

Problem #1 – According to the data, there isn't a substantial risk of transmitting Covid to someone else that will cause severe bodily harm if the person transmitting the virus is asymptomatic or presymptomatic.

Problem #2 – The vaccine doesn't meaningfully reduce risk. At least there is no direct evidence to support this claim yet.

Emergency Use Authorize Vaccine (EUA)

The current covid-19 vaccines have been rushed to market. They are authorized under Emergency Use Authorization from the FDA. This does not mean the vaccines have met the relevant and rigorous standards of the FDA. It usually takes years to get FDA approval.

Plus, We've never had a successful, long-term vaccine for coronaviruses.

First-Ever mRNA Vaccine

Moderna, NIAID vaccine is a COVID-19 vaccine authorized by FDA and recommended by the CDC for use in the US for a limited population.

This is new technology. The first-ever mRNA vaccine.

It might turn out to be wonderful and great. It may turn out to have unexpected problems.

Just look at 1976, when authorities rushed a swine flu vaccine that caused 10x more harm than the swine flu pandemic did.

Note, if the video below is broken, then it's because youtube is actively censoring this information. As of this writing, the video works.

The Swine Flu Scare of 1976

Historically speaking, rushing a vaccine has always been a bad idea.

Federal Law

Federal law says that if the vaccine is only authorized for distribution as an emergency vaccine, then it cannot be compelled onto anybody without informed consent. So anybody that is requiring a covid vaccine is violating the specific terms of federal law.

This law has never been adjudicated in court before because no one has ever tried to mandate, force or coerce, or condition access to benefits on an emergency vaccine. An emergency vaccine that has novel technology for a novel virus, to boot.

The Complete Lack Of Any Cost-Benefit Analysis Is Disturbing

One of the more shocking and suspicious points regarding everything related to the covid pandemic policy response and public health intervention was the authority's complete lack of any cost-benefit analysis.

Do we actually think it hasn't been done or they've done it and the data looks bad?

Conclusion

What public figures, politicians, celebrities, mainstream media companies, tech giants, and your pro-covid vaccine neighbors are doing to manipulate and coerce you into taking an experimental covid 19 vaccine is illegal under current law.

Unfortunately, knee-jerk reactions in the real world ignore the law and until these issues are tried in court, expect the coercion tactics to continue.

There is hope. The law is on our side. For now.

Read Global Elites Advance Great Reset Agenda


https://www.facinghistory.org/resource-library/supreme-court-and-sterilization-carrie-buck

https://www.uscourts.gov/educational-resources/educational-activities/facts-and-case-summary-korematsu-v-us

https://www.cdc.gov/tuskegee/timeline.htm

https://www.npr.org/2015/06/22/415194765/u-s-troops-tested-by-race-in-secret-world-war-ii-chemical-experiments

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unit_731

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/197/11/

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacobson_v._Massachusetts

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
26 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Gene Morris
Admin
1 month ago

🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥

Average preson
Average preson
30 days ago

I’m with pushing people to get the COVID Vaccine. It’s doing far more good than bad. There’s always resistance to new things. Even when vaccines first came out people resisted them, and now guess what, there’s no polio in the world.

L L
L L
30 days ago
Reply to  Average preson

Hey, troll! 🙂 There’s always resistance to stupidity, but never enough among the bots and trolls and the “average presons” of the world.
Peace to You
May God bless you in every way

George
30 days ago

Why your program is getting involved in politics?, stick to markets , economic from whatever point of
view, all is fine. Politics is too involved with 1000’s of interested parties , now , every single
human being has their own ideas , try to discuss about masks, vaccines , ect you won’t get anywhere .

Average person
Average person
30 days ago
Reply to  George

Yes I totally agree. I don’t give two shits about anyone else’s political views. There’s a million of them and everyone’s view is wrong lol

The only thing I am here for and what I care about is increasing cashflow and holding on to more of my money. _THATS IT_

L L
L L
30 days ago
Reply to  Average person

Bulls get rich, and Bears get rich, but greedy Pigs get slaughtered. And Average Presons are always the ones left hodling the bag. George and Robert are the guys who know something. You’re here to learn from George and Robert. But YOU’RE trying to school THEM! LOL YOU’RE telling THEM politics can be divorced from wealth destruction/creation? No. You’re too ignorant to recognize your teachers’ superiority on this matter, as compared to your own foolish, greedy, unschooled idea that money is creaeted in a political vacuum. George and Robert KNOW and SAY: POLITICS MATTERS. Duh! Listen up to the Maestros,… Read more »

William Jenkins
William Jenkins
30 days ago

vaccine passports means you encourage slavery and have no instinct for personal preservation! Among other things.

Sil Boersma
Sil Boersma
30 days ago

hear, hear!

Ava
Ava
30 days ago

George, please know your work and involvement in this is very important. Please ignore people who are saying “stick to economics, markets blahblah”, guess what people, it is all intertwined, George himself said many times, it doesn’t matter how much money you have, personal liberty is what’s important and if you don’t have that, you are poor. So these commenters are narrowminded, but hopefully when they run into nonsense, roadblocks as they are perhaps travelling for business or trying to open new business, they will realize that they too need to start caring about these things. Keep doing what you… Read more »

L L
L L
30 days ago
Reply to  Ava

Yes. They’re probably trolls and bots, anyway! 🙂

Xyz
Xyz
30 days ago

Just fyi, There are corporations starting now to call people 100% to work . They are using language like strongly encourage to take vaccine and update your health information in company records. Otherwise you will have to get tested for COVID before entering building. This is law wise correct because they are not forcing anyone but creating obstacles and mental pressure so people are breaking up and taking vaccines.

L L
L L
30 days ago
Reply to  Xyz

“This is law wise correct because they are not forcing anyone” Just FYI, it’s called COERCION. “Using language like . . . ” Orwellian Doublespeak, a.k.a. Veiled Threats, Gaslighting. a.k.a. Coercion. Look it up. Psy-ops. Look it up. Discrimination. Look it up. Constitutional Rights – Look it up! You’re starting with the assumption that getting people to take the Vaxx is supposedly a good thing, lol. No. NO, no, no. And you think it’s GOOD that employers are “creating obstacles” for ONE group of people, but NOT for other? Discrimination. And you think it’s good that employers are “creating mental… Read more »

Arnaldo Sanchez
30 days ago

Hi George,  I am a physician and epidemiologist. I want to thank you for the educational work you do. Regarding the subject of vaccine passports, things are not as simple. This is an example of how a person’s freedom ends where the freedom of another begins. Those who don’t want vaccination are free to say no, but those who want/had the vaccine should also be able to exercise their freedom to limit potential transmission. I believe that to find a middle point, we should always see science and evidence, but I would agree that it shouldn’t be centralized politicians and… Read more »

L L
L L
30 days ago

So you have an M.D, and that gives you credibility in they eyes of the ignorant (sorry), bestowed by a medical school whose agenda was set by pharmaceutical company shills, put in place by globalist oligarchs.
Besides, just what would that “middle” point be? How about NO CENSORSHIP of medical professionals who actively oppose the vaccine, masks, isolation, lockdown, etc.? Cause we are really, really far left of the “middle” regarding information the media allows out.
Peace to you
Peace to All

Marc Maximilien Authier
Marc Maximilien Authier
30 days ago

Ther first ”heath passport” saw the day in 1934 in ????? NAZI GERMANY in the town of Hambourg and later became a national standard. Later the same ”health passports” were used to EXTERMNATE and SEND to the International Business Machine AG FARBE Waffen SS extermination camps. And today who again is working on the ”healtt passports”. Microsoft and eugenicist nazi IBM !!!!!!! Enough said. It is about enslaving us into a medical tyranny like Nazi Germany where YOUR OWN BODY belongs to the likes of Gates and these psychopathic big pharma nazis. Behind all this hides indeed the AGENDA 21… Read more »

L L
L L
30 days ago

Wow. Didn’t fully realize that there were actually “health passports” in Nazi Germany. I thought it was more a metaphor people were using! I have learned more World History in the past year than I ever did in all my school days. I feel like I should just tear up my own degree.
Don’t forget Nazi George Soros, btw.
Strangely, being of Jewish heritage doesn’t preclude anyone from being a Nazi.
Wasn’t Hitler partly of Jewish heritage?
Btw, for potential haters: I’m not anti-semitic. I AM anti totalitarian and PRO-Constitution!
Peace to All

L L
L L
30 days ago

Amazing Polly’s video “Is This Torture?” https://www.bitchute.com/video/GMgc6A7Mjyay/ examines “No Touch Torture” and whether the ‘covid19’ lockdowns, psyops, etc. qualify as such, as defined by Amnesty International. Polly goes through Amnesty International’s pamphlet line by line. This is an amazing video, and got Polly very, VERY banned from Youtube over a year ago. 🙂 —–>>> Rock on you guys! End the Effing Fed! 🙂
Peace, Liberty, Justice, and Love for All

L L
L L
30 days ago

Some day soon, not every day will be Stiff Drink Time. 🙂 Victory Drink time, instead, lol. Check out thehealthyamerican.org You can show up in person to help KEEP what the quasi-authorities are doing illegal, and to force them to follow the law or be sued for defrauding the public, and worse, and imprisoned. thehealthyamerican.org Over 1,000 people showed up at the May 11, 2021 hearing in Orange County, California to protest vaccine passports. Approximately 500 people signed up to speak at the hearing for 3 minutes each. The Supervisors cut the speaking time down due to the enormous crowd,… Read more »

L L
L L
30 days ago

MY DREAM-WISH-REALITY: Robert Barnes and George Gammon show up in Orange County, California at the next scheduled meeting where the O.C. Board of Supervisors will be considering whether to put a Vaccine Passport in place or not (not sure of that date, June 8th ?). Robert Barnes !!! Teaming up with Peggy Hall and her ever-growing posse of not-so-average citizens and celeb Constitutional Law Loving activists!!! —>>> I rarely come out of my cave, but I WILL commit to buying BOTH of you gentlemen a Good,Stiff Drink, lol. Hopefully, Victory Drinks! 🙂 Okay. My Stuart Smalley hat is now in… Read more »

L L
L L
30 days ago

12:33

Russ
Russ
30 days ago

Sorry but your equivalence falls short in my opinion. Having Dr.’s perform experimental operations attempting not to cure but to determine whether they can answer some medical question they themselves have is not the same as Dr.’s test a cure for a deadly pandemic finding out it meets standards and then trying to save lives with their vaccine is not the same. You can argue it seems the same, but I would prefer you stay in your lane and discuss economics and not medicine for which you have zero knowledge or experience.

Glen Cast
Glen Cast
29 days ago

I did not know about the Nuremberg Code, thank you for the information. To me it feels like they are pushing you to do it and almost in a obligating kind of way. I just didn’t know that there was a name for it and it had happen before. History was a hard subject for me but putting it like this it is easy for me to understand. I believe this subject to be intertwined with finances. Thank you.

Milko Ciok
Milko Ciok
29 days ago

Ultimately there is only one law and that is Gods Law .
The law we generally refer to is that created by man and without exception the golden rule applies ie those with the gold make the rules (of course these laws are not for the benefit of the masses ). people need to rise up or else we are in big trouble

Peter
Peter
29 days ago

What good is it to have wealth if you don’t have an army to protect it? The push for these vaccine passports is the camel’s nose in the tent to move towards full control of everything you do and own. George is right to alert everybody that we are in very serious territory right now.

Kealan
Kealan
29 days ago

The level of centralised control that’s about to be transferred over to governments (and their proprietors) would not have occurred in Stalin’s wildest dreams….

Bradford Janes
Bradford Janes
29 days ago

American Liberty is not facing organic opposition. When American international interests that grew form the American fabric realized their new international audience had interests that conflict with American interests, they began to patronize them to assure acceptance and profit. Eventually those hostile foreign interests infiltrated corporate boards, political office, etc. The American Patriot class must awaken to the realization that if they don’t rise to secure the Republic it will simply be taken from them at gun point, because government is a gun. After all, if government derives its powers from the people, only the people, not the government, are… Read more »

Last edited 29 days ago by Bradford Janes