For media related inquiries, contact our team at

The Shocking Consequences of Raising the Debt Ceiling


The recent news headlines have been dominated by discussions surrounding the United States debt ceiling and the potentially catastrophic consequences if the issue remains unresolved.

However, amidst the frenzy, the mainstream media fails to shed light on what occurs when the debt ceiling is raised.

In this article, we will delve into the mechanics of the balance sheets, analyze the role of bank reserves, and address concerns about a looming liquidity crisis. Watch the video above for a more thorough analysis.

By examining the intricate details and considering counterparty risk, we aim to understand the situation and dispel any unwarranted fears comprehensively.

The Interplay of Balance Sheets

To grasp the implications of raising the debt ceiling, let's examine the balance sheets of various stakeholders: the government, the Federal Reserve, banks, and non-bank entities represented by the average Joe.

Understanding these elements is essential to comprehending the potential liquidity crisis that may arise once the debt ceiling is lifted. Assets and liabilities are key components in this analysis, with bank reserves, treasuries, and mortgage-backed securities featuring prominently.

Analyzing the Mechanics of a Potential Liquidity Crisis

When discussing the consequences of raising the debt ceiling, the focus turns to the actions taken by Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen. Yellen intends to bolster the Treasury General Account (TGA) and issue a substantial volume of Treasury bills (T-bills) once the debt ceiling issue is resolved.

This flood of supply in a short period has sparked concerns about a potential liquidity crisis. Let's delve into the mechanics and plumbing of balance sheets to understand the implications.

Impact on Balance Sheets

As the government aims to fill up the TGA and acquire more bank reserves, treasuries are added to the liability side of their balance sheet.

Simultaneously, the Federal Reserve transfers bank reserves from the commercial banking system to the government's account. This raises the question of why such actions are taken.

When non-bank entities, like the average Joe, purchase these T-bills, banks visit the average Joe's account and reduce the number of dollars, consequently reducing their balance sheets' liability.

Additionally, they transfer bank reserves to the government's account, causing their balance sheets to contract.

Examining the Liquidity Crisis Theory

The concern arises when we observe a contraction in bank balance sheets and a reduction in bank reserves due to T-bill purchases.

Critics argue that this reduction in liquidity could lead to cash shortages, similar to recent events involving Silicon Valley Bank and Signature First Republic.

The theory suggests that the government's sale of T-bills contracts bank balance sheets and reduces liquidity.

Moreover, the massive supply of T-bills could lead to higher interest rates, requiring the Federal Reserve to implement yield curve control.

This, in turn, may lead to the creation of new bank reserves and potentially weaken the dollar.

Debunking the Liquidity Crisis Theory

While the theory presented may seem plausible, it is essential to consider additional factors and nuances. Looking at the Federal Reserve's balance sheet provides a more comprehensive understanding.

The reverse repo (RRP) account, currently totaling $2.2 trillion, is a liability of the Federal Reserve and serves as a repository for funds from money market funds. This account plays a crucial role in assessing liquidity levels. When analyzing the ratio of reserves to deposits, we observe an increased buffer, indicating a lower likelihood of a liquidity crunch.

Considering Different Bank Sizes and Counterparty Risk

Critics argue that smaller banks may face liquidity issues compared to larger banks, which are flush with reserves.

However, the impact on bank reserves would be minimal if T-bills are primarily purchased by non-bank entities that bank with midsize and small banks.

Additionally, the argument that T-bills are more liquid than bank reserves suggests that banks prefer holding T-bills, which are globally accepted as collateral.

Moreover, the presence of primary dealers in the market can lead to increased liquidity through the rehypothecation of collateral.

The Role of Counterparty Risk

When assessing liquidity, counterparty risk plays a crucial role. If the perceived counterparty risk within the commercial banking system is low, liquidity is expected to be high.

Consequently, raising the debt ceiling and reducing the risk of default would likely decrease perceived counterparty risk, suggesting increased liquidity in the system.


While concerns have been raised about the potential liquidity crisis following the raising of the debt ceiling, a comprehensive examination of the mechanics and nuances reveals a different perspective.

We can better evaluate the situation by considering the interplay of balance sheets, bank reserves' role, and counterparty risk's importance. The notion that raising the debt ceiling will inevitably result in a liquidity crisis is overly simplistic.

Analyzing the details, probabilities, and wider context is vital to form a well-informed perspective.